Jeremy James Cotten v. City of Los Angeles

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20202:19-cv-10565California4,413 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: CV 19-10565SVW (KSx) JEREMY JAMES COTTEN, an District Judge: Hon. Steven V. Wilson 11 individual; MARGARET LAUREL Magistrate Judge: Hon. Karen Stevenson COTTEN, an individual, 12

13 Plaintiffs, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE v. ORDER 14

CITY OF LOS ANGELES; LOS

Complaint Filed: 12/13/19 15 ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Trial Date: TBD 16 Defendants. 17

18 19 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 20 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 21 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 22 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following 23 Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer 24 blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.