Darryl Hann v. William Ketterer

JS-6

FILED

3 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 4 3/4/2020 5 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BY: CW DEPUTY

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 11 ED CV 20-368-JAK (SPx) Plaintiff 12 v. 13 || WILLIAM KETTERER, et al.,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

14 STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 17 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 | County of San Bernardino for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. 19 “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 || Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great Northern R. Co. 22 lv. Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Where Congress has acted to create a right of removal,…