Darryl Hann v. William Ketterer

JS-

FILED

CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT 3/4/2020 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BY: CW DEPUTY

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 ED CV 20-368-JAK (SPx) Plaintiff v. 13 || WILLIAM KETTERER, et al.,

ORDER REMANDING CASE TO

STATE COURT Defendant(s). 16 The Court sua sponte REMANDS this action to the California Superior Court for the 18 County of San Bernardino for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as set forth below. “The right of removal is entirely a creature of statute and ‘a suit commenced in a state 20 || court must remain there until cause is shown for its transfer under some act of Congress.” 21 || Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. Henson, 537 U.S. 28, 32 (2002) (quoting Great Northern R. Co. lv. Alexander, 246 U.S. 276, 280 (1918)). Where Congress has acted to create a right of removal,…