April Lorraine Miranda v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20202:18-cv-10083California2,429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

APRIL M. Case No. 2:18-cv-10083-GJS

Plaintiff

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

v. ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL,2 Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

17 Plaintiff April M. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of Defendant 18 Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her application for 19 Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). The parties filed consents to proceed before 20 the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 11, 12] and briefs addressing 21 disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 21 (“Pltf.’s Br.”), and Dkt. 25 (“Def.’s Br.”).] The 22 Court has taken the parties’ briefing under submission without oral argument. For 23 the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that this matter should be remanded for

25 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party.

Andrew M. Saul, the Commissioner of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.