April Lorraine Miranda v. Nancy A. Berryhill

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 APRIL M.1 Case No. 2:18-cv-10083-GJS

12 Plaintiff

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

13 v. ORDER ANDREW M. SAUL,2 Commissioner 14 of Social Security,

15 Defendant.

16

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

17 Plaintiff April M. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of Defendant 18 Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) denial of her application for 19 Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”). The parties filed consents to proceed before 20 the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge [Dkts. 11, 12] and briefs addressing 21 disputed issues in the case [Dkt. 21 (“Pltf.’s Br.”), and Dkt. 25 (“Def.’s Br.”).] The 22 Court has taken the parties’ briefing under submission without oral argument. For 23 the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that this matter should be remanded for 24

25 1 In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of 26 the last name of the non-governmental party.

27 2 Andrew M. Saul, the Commissioner of…