Daniela Hernandez v. PIH Health, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20202:20-cv-01662California613 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-1662-DMG (JEMx) Date March 5, 2020

Title Daniela Hernandez v. PIH Health, Inc. Page 1 of 2

Present: The Honorable DOLLY M. GEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

KANE TIEN NOT REPORTED

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s) Attorneys Present for Defendant(s) None Present None Present

Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS—ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT

On February 20, 2020, Plaintiff Daniela Hernandez filed a Class Action Complaint against Defendant PIH Health, Inc. for (1) negligence, (2) intrusion into private affairs, (3) breach of express contract, (4) breach of implied contract, (5) negligence per se, (6) breach of fiduciary duty, (7) violation of California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, and (8) violation of California Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). [Doc. # 1.]

The Complaint asserts that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.