Tiffni Altes v. Bulletproof 360, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
O 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 TIFFNI ALTES, Case No. 2:19-cv-04409-ODW (SKx) 12 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART, AND
13 v.
DENYING IN PART, DEFENDANT’S
14 BULLETPROOF 360, INC., MOTION TO DISMISS [29] 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Defendant Bulletproof 360, Inc. (“Bulletproof”) moves to dismiss claims in 20 Plaintiff Tiffni Altes’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) alleging that Bulletproof 21 presents misleading health claims on its product’s label. (See generally Mot. to 22 Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 29.) For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS IN 23 PART, AND DENIES IN PART, Bulletproof’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”).1 24 II. BACKGROUND 25 Bulletproof manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells Bulletproof Cold Brew 26 Coffee (“Coffee Product”). (FAC ¶ 3, ECF No. 26.) Altes alleges that she purchased 27
28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral…