Maria Zavala v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 6, 20202:19-cv-00999California5,123 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA GUADALUPE ZAVALA, CASE NO. CV 19-0999 AS Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM OPINION ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,1 15 Defendant. 16 17 For the reasons discussed below, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the Commissioner’s decision is affirmed. 21 PROCEEDINGS 23 On February 11, 2019, Maria Guadalupe Zavala (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint seeking review of the denial of her application 26 Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, is substituted for his predecessor. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 28 for disability benefits by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Agency”). (Dkt. No. 1). The parties have consented to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. Nos. 9, 16, 18). On June 26, 2019, Defendant filed an Answer along with the …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.