Adam Ghadiri v. Doan Family Chiropractic

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20208:20-cv-00361California211 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL

Case No. 8:20-cv-00361-JLS-DFM Date: March 09, 2020 Title: Adam Ghadiri v. Doan Family Chiropractic et al.

Present: HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Terry Guerrero N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT:

Not Present Not Present

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION

On February 26, 2020, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the Court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim and other state-law claim. (Doc. 6.) In that Order, the Court explicitly stated that “[f]ailure to respond may, without further warning, result in dismissal of the entire action without prejudice.” (Id. at 2.) Plaintiff has not filed a response. As noted in the Court’s prior Order, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) the Court has the inherent power to dismiss an action for a plaintiff’s failure to comply with a court order. See Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 (1962); Hells Canyon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.