Miguel Hernandez v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20202:19-cv-01299California3,480 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 MIGUEL A. HERNANDEZ, Case No. CV 19-1299-AS 11 Plaintiff, 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION v. 13 AND ORDER OF REMAND ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner 14 of Social Security,1

15 Defendant. 16 17 For the reasons discussed below, it is hereby ordered that, 18 pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this matter is 19 remanded for further administrative action consistent with this 20 Opinion. 21 22 PROCEEDINGS 23 24 On February 21, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Complaint seeking 25 review of the Commissioner’s denial of Plaintiff’s applications 26 1 Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, is 27 substituted for his predecessor. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d). 28 1 for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits 2 (“DIB”), and supplemental security income (“SSI”), respectively, 3 under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. (Dkt. No. 1). 4 On July 23, 2019, Defendant filed an Answer and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.