Janet Salazar v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 9, 20205:19-cv-01466California5,408 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JANET S., ) NO. ED CV 19-1466-E ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ) AND ORDER OF REMAND

ADMINISTRATION, )

15 ) Defendant. ) 16 ____________________________________) 17 18 Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), IT IS 19 HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s motions for summary 20 judgment are denied, and this matter is remanded for further 21 administrative action consistent with this Opinion. 22 23 PROCEEDINGS 24 25 Plaintiff filed a complaint on August 7, 2019, seeking review of 26 the Commissioner’s denial of benefits. The parties consented to 27 proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge on August 22, 2019. 28 Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on December 6, 2019. 1 Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on February 5, 2020. 2 The Court has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.