Arvello Tufono v. J. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 11, 20202:19-cv-10578California549 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ARVELLO TUFONO, ) NO. CV 19-10578-JFW (KS)

11 ) Plaintiff, 12 ) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND v. ) 13 ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

14 )

J. WILLIAMS, et al, )

15 ) 16 Defendant. ) _________________________________ 17 18 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all of the records 19 herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and 20 Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report (“Objections”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) 21 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the 22 Report to which objections have been stated. 23 24 Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set 25 forth in the Report. In doing so, the Court amends the Report to correct the following 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.