Walter Glenn Compton v. Montgomery

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 10, 20202:16-cv-08557California394 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2 O 3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 WALTER GLENN COMPTON, Case No. 2:16-cv-08557-ODW-KES

12 Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND

13 v.

RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED

14 WARREN MONTGOMERY, STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

15 Warden,

16 Respondent.

17

18

19 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the initial Petition (Dkt.

20 1), the operative First Amended Petition (Dkt. 66), the Report and Recommendation 21 of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 83), and the other records on file herein. 22 Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report 23 and Recommendation to which objections (Dkt. 84, 85) have been made. The Court 24 accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 25 Petitioner’s objections appear to raise claims of prosecutorial misconduct 26 based on the prosecutor’s alleged mischaracterization of evidence during argument 27 and/or the prosecutor’s decision to introduce certain evidence at trial. (See Dkt. 84 28 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.