Plutos Sama Holdings, Inc. v. Torsten Maehle

O 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court 9 Central District of California 10 11 PLUTOS SAMA HOLDINGS, INC., Case № 8:19-cv-01010-ODW (AGRx)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

13 v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS [31]

14 TORSTEN MAEHLE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Defendant Michael Beilenson (“Beilenson”) moves to dismiss Plaintiff Plutos 19 Sama Holdings, Inc. (“Plutos”)’s Complaint. (Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 20 31.) Plutos failed to oppose the Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”). (See Notice of Non- 21 Receipt of Opp’n (“Notice”), ECF No. 32.) For the reasons that follow, the Court 22 GRANTS Beilenson’s Motion.1 23 II. BACKGROUND 24 Plutos is a holding company with interests across a wide array of industries, 25 including retail consumer markets. (Compl. ¶ 22, ECF No. 1.) Plutos initiated this 26 civil action against Beilenson and six other individual Defendants, including Jurg 27

28 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the…