Raul Cervantes Valenzuela v. V. Torres

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20202:19-cv-07559California3,359 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 RAUL CERVANTES VALENZUELA, Case No. CV 19-7559-CJC (KK) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DISMISSING SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH

V. TORRES, ET AL., LEAVE TO AMEND Defendants. 15 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Raul Cervantes Valenzuela (“Plaintiff” or “Cervantes”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). As discussed below, the Court dismisses the SAC with leave to amend. II. BACKGROUND On August 29, 2019, Cervantes, currently an inmate at California State Prison – Sacramento (“CSP-SAC”), constructively filed1 a complaint (“Complaint”) pursuant 27 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se inmate gives prison authorities a to Section 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) against defendants V. Torres, D. Moisa, and Sgt.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.