Heidi M. Sicurella v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20202:19-cv-10384California392 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I.

BACKGROUND

On December 6, 2019, Plaintiff Heidi S. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint challenging the denial of her application for Title II Disability Insurance Benefits and/or Title XVI Supplemental Security Income by the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Defendant”). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 1.

On December 11, 2019, the Court issued a Case Management Order (“CMO”) instructing Plaintiff to “promptly serve the summons and complaint on the Commissioner,” and to “electronically file a proof of service” within ninety-seven (97) days of the filing of the Complaint, i.e. no later than March 12, 2020. Dkt. 9 at 1-2. The CMO warned Plaintiff that failure to follow those instructions “may result in dismissal of this case.” Id. at 2.

As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff still has not filed a proof of service, per the Court’s

CMO.

///

1 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States.

II.

DISCUSSION

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the Court may dismiss an action with prejudice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.