Hill Phoenix, Inc. v. Classic Refrigeration SoCal, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
HILL PHOENIX, INC., Case No.: 8:19-cv-00695-DOC-JDE Plaintiff, v.
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
CLASSIC REFRIGERATION SOCAL,
INC. et al.,
JUDGMENT
Defendants. Before the Court is Plaintiff Hill Phoenix, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”) (Dkt. 121), accompanied by a supporting Memorandum (Dkt. 121-1). Having reviewed the parties’ moving papers and considered their oral arguments, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion. I. Background A. Facts The following facts are drawn from Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (Dkt. 101); the Counterclaims of Defendants David Rogers (“Rogers”) and Classic Refrigeration SoCal, Inc. (“Classic”) (“Counterclaims”) (Dkt. 104); and Plaintiff’s Memorandum in support of 10 the instant Motion. Plaintiff Hill Phoenix, Inc. is a retail refrigeration company, and operates an 11 aftermarket services group (“AMS Group”) as part of its business. FAC ¶ 7. Defendant Rogers 12 first began working for Plaintiff in August 2014 as a…