Hill Phoenix, Inc. v. Classic Refrigeration SoCal, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 15, 20208:19-cv-00695California5,405 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

HILL PHOENIX, INC., Case No.: 8:19-cv-00695-DOC-JDE Plaintiff, v.

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

CLASSIC REFRIGERATION SOCAL,

INC. et al.,

JUDGMENT

Defendants. Before the Court is Plaintiff Hill Phoenix, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”) (Dkt. 121), accompanied by a supporting Memorandum (Dkt. 121-1). Having reviewed the parties’ moving papers and considered their oral arguments, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s Motion. I. Background A. Facts The following facts are drawn from Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) (Dkt. 101); the Counterclaims of Defendants David Rogers (“Rogers”) and Classic Refrigeration SoCal, Inc. (“Classic”) (“Counterclaims”) (Dkt. 104); and Plaintiff’s Memorandum in support of 10 the instant Motion. Plaintiff Hill Phoenix, Inc. is a retail refrigeration company, and operates an 11 aftermarket services group (“AMS Group”) as part of its business. FAC ¶ 7. Defendant Rogers 12 first began working for Plaintiff in August 2014 as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.