Aer Stephen v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 13, 20202:18-cv-08461California4,753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AER S., ) No. CV 18-8461 FFM ) Plaintiff, ) MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ) ORDER v. ) ) ANDREW M. SAUL, ) Commissioner of the Social Security ) Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 17

PROCEEDINGS IN THIS COURT

19 Plaintiff seeks to overturn the decision of the Commissioner of the Social 20 Security Administration denying his applications for disability insurance benefits 21 (“DIB”) and supplemental security income. The parties have consented to the 22 jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 23 636(c). Pursuant to the Case Management Order filed on October 3, 2018, on July 8, 24 2019, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation (“JS”) detailing each party’s arguments and 25 authorities. The Court has reviewed the administrative record (the “AR”) and the Joint 26 Stipulation. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is reversed 27 and the matter remanded.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.