Jane Doe K.G. v. Pasadena Hospital Association, Ltd.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20202:18-cv-08710California7,225 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 JANE DOE K.G. et al., Case № 2:18-cv-08710-ODW (MAAx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 14 PASADENA HOSPITAL MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND ASSOCIATION, LTD. et al., STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [41] [45] [46] [55] [65] Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Defendants the Pasadena Hospital Association, LTD. d/b/a Huntington 19 Memorial Hospital (“Hospital”), Doctor Patrick Sutton (“Sutton”), and the Medical 20 Staff of Huntington Memorial Hospital (“Medical Staff”) (collectively “Defendants”) 21 move to dismiss and strike Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Class Action Complaint 22 (“Motions”). (ECF Nos. 41, 45, 46, 55, 65.) For the reasons discussed below, the 23 Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motions.1 II. BACKGROUND On January 24, 2019, Plaintiffs Jane Does K.G., T.F., B.S., and W.D. 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.