Anthony Scott Grantham v. The People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20202:19-cv-10106California1,052 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 Case No. CV 19-10106 VAP (MRW) ANTHONY SCOTT GRANTHAM,

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Petitioner,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

17 Respondent.

19 The Court dismisses this habeas corpus action for lack of federal jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). * * * 1. Petitioner is currently an inmate in local custody. According to the California Attorney General, Petitioner was recently convicted at trial in San Bernardino Superior Court on charges of resisting arrest and evading a peace officer. (Docket # 15 at 12; 16-12 (criminal minute order).) 27 28 2. The pending habeas corpus action in this Court challenges the validity of a sentence from an earlier state criminal action. (Docket # 6.) Based on Petitioner’s reference to (a) the case number, (b) place of conviction, and (c) description of the previous proceedings, the Attorney General rightly concludes that Petitioner challenges his 2016 plea in Los Angeles…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.