David Lancaster v. Spencer Hansen
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6 7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 DAVID LANCASTER, Case № 5:19-cv-01093-ODW (KKx)
Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [39] 15 SPENCER HANSEN,
16 Defendant. 17 On February 19, 2020, Plaintiff David Lancaster moved for leave to file a First 19 Amended Complaint, adding a cause of action for breach of contract to this trademark 20 infringement action (“Motion”). (Mot. for Leave to File First Am. Compl. (“Mot.”), 21 ECF No. 39.) Plaintiff set the Motion to be heard on March 23, 2010, and thus any 22 opposition was due no later than March 2, 2020. See C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-9. To date, 23 Defendant has filed no opposition. The failure to file a timely opposition may be 24 deemed consent to the granting of a motion. C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-12; Ghazali v. Moran, 25 46 F.3d 52, 54 (9th Cir. 1995). After carefully considering the moving papers, the Court finds Plaintiff has 27 shown good cause to amend the complaint pursuant…