Joanna Martinez v. FCA US, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 17, 20202:20-cv-02400California480 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOANNA MARTINEZ, CV 20-2400 DSF (RAOx) Plaintiff, Order Remanding Case to State v. Court

FCA US, LLC, et al., Defendants.

This case was removed from state court on the basis of diversity. It is undisputed that one of the Defendants, Santa Monica Chrysler Jeep Dodge Ram, is not diverse from Plaintiff. Removing Defendant FCA US, LLC argues that Santa Monica is fraudulently joined. A defendant who is a resident of the forum state is fraudulently joined “‘if the plaintiff fails to state a cause of action against [the] resident defendant, and the failure is obvious according to the settled rules of the state.’” Morris v. Princess Cruises, Inc., 236 F.3d 1061, 1067 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting McCabe v. Gen. Foods Corp., 811 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1987)). “[T]he test for fraudulent joinder and for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) are not equivalent.” Grancare, LLC v. Thrower, 889 F.3d 543, 549 (9th Cir. 2018). In evaluating a claim of fraudulent joinder, “a federal court must find that a defendant was properly joined and remand the case to state court if there is a ‘possibility…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.