Yonkani Manuel Bojorquez v. Ken Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20202:19-cv-07501California627 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 YONKANI MANUEL BOJORQUEZ, ) N O . C V - - A B ( K S ) 11 Petitioner, ) ) v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND ) ) RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED KEN CLARK, Warden, ) STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ) Respondent. ) _________________________________

17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (“Petition”), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). Pursuant to U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated. 24 In the Objections, Petitioner repeatedly asserts that, contrary to findings of the Report, he is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.