Eric Hodonsky v. Allstate Insurance Co

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20202:19-cv-01049California1,205 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

JS-

7 United States District Court 8 Central District of California 9 10 11 ERIC HODONSKY, Case No. 2:19-cv-01049-ODW (GJSx) Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING AS MOOT

v.

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

14 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY; SUMMARY JUDGMENT [13] AND 15 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY SUA SPONTE REMANDING TO

OF CALIFORNIA; ALLSTATE STATE COURT

16 NORTHBROOK INDEMNITY

17 COMPANY, Defendants. I. INTRODUCTION 20 Plaintiff, Eric Hodonsky brings this action against Allstate Insurance Company, 22 Allstate Insurance Company of California, and Northbrook Indemnity Company for 23 failing to insure his automobile collision claim. (See Notice of Removal Ex. 1 24 (“Compl.”), ECF No. 1-1.) Defendants asserts that Hodonsky’s collision occurred the 25 day before he purchased automobile insurance, and therefore, Defendants owe no 26 contractual obligation to pay for the collision damages. 27 28 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment 2 (“Motion”). (Mot., ECF No. 13.) For the following reasons, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.