Does

Barbara Sanchez v. Does

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20202:20-cv-01867California1,663 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARBARA SANCHEZ, ) Case No. CV 20-1867 FMO (ASx) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER REMANDING ACTION ) DOES 1 THROUGH 100, Inclusive, ) PRAXAIR, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) 17 On June 12, 2019, plaintiff filed a Complaint in the Santa Barbara County Superior Court against Doe defendants, (see Dkt. 1-1, Complaint), which according to removing defendant include Praxair, Inc. (“Praxair”) and Nusil Technology LLC (“NuSil”). (See Dkt. 1, Notice of Removal (“NOR”) at ¶¶ 1, 13-14). On February 26, 2020, Praxair removed that action on diversity jurisdiction grounds pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (See id. at ¶ 10). “Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. They possess only that power authorized by Constitution and statute[.]” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 377, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 1675 (1994). The courts are presumed to lack…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.