Curtis Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11 CURTIS B., an Individual, Case No.: 5:18-01051 ADS
Plaintiff,
v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
OF REMAND
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Curtis B.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul2, Commissioner of Social Security’s (hereinafter “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial 20
1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil 22 Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 23 2 The complaint, and thus the docket, do not name the Commissioner of Social Security. On June 17, 2019, Saul became the Commissioner. Thus, he is automatically substituted 24 as the defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). of his application for supplemental security income (“SSI”). For the reasons stated below, the decision of the Commissioner is…