Renee J. Barbee v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20202:18-cv-08098California2,523 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RENEE J. B., ) Case No. CV 18-8098-PJW ) Plaintiff, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER v. ) ) ANDREW M. SAUL, )

COMMISSIONER OF THE )

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff appeals a decision by Defendant Social Security Administration (“the Agency”), denying her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). She contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred when she discounted Plaintiff’s testimony and when she rejected the treating doctor’s opinion that Plaintiff could not work. For the reasons discussed below, the ALJ’s decision is affirmed.1 26 27 28 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 25(d), Andrew M. Saul is hereby substituted in as the defendant. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.