City of Los Angeles v. Jefferson B. Sessions III
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20202:17-cv-07215California802 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
JS-
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No.: 2:17-cv-07215-JLS-JC
CITY OF LOS ANGELES,
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND
Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT
v. Judge: Honorable Josephine L. Staton 14 WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND FINAL JUDGMENT
I. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BYRNE JAG CLAIMS
On September 13, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiff City of Los Angeles □□□□□□□□ a preliminary injunction with respect to its claims that the immigration-related Notice and Access Conditions! that Defendants imposed on the Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistant Grant (“Byrne JAG”) program were unlawful. ECF No. 93. The Court held that the “Notice and Access Conditions exceed statutory authority, and trying to impose such conditions is a violation of the separation of powers doctrine and ultra vires.” Id. at 4. …