City of Los Angeles v. Jefferson B. Sessions III

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20202:17-cv-07215California802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case No.: 2:17-cv-07215-JLS-JC

CITY OF LOS ANGELES,

PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND

Plaintiff, FINAL JUDGMENT

v. Judge: Honorable Josephine L. Staton 14 WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General of the United States, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND FINAL JUDGMENT

I. FISCAL YEAR 2017 BYRNE JAG CLAIMS

On September 13, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiff City of Los Angeles □□□□□□□□ a preliminary injunction with respect to its claims that the immigration-related Notice and Access Conditions! that Defendants imposed on the Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2017 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistant Grant (“Byrne JAG”) program were unlawful. ECF No. 93. The Court held that the “Notice and Access Conditions exceed statutory authority, and trying to impose such conditions is a violation of the separation of powers doctrine and ultra vires.” Id. at 4. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.