Albert Castro v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20208:18-cv-02164California5,210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 ALBERT C., an Individual, Case No.: 8:18-02164 ADS

Plaintiff,

v.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Albert C.1 (“Plaintiff”) challenges Defendant Andrew M. Saul2, Commissioner of Social Security’s (hereinafter “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denial of his applications for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits (“DIB”),

22 1 Plaintiff’s name has been partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court 23 Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 2 On June 17, 2019, Saul became the Commissioner of Social Security. Thus, he is 24 automatically substituted as the defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d). and supplemental security income (“SSI”). Plaintiff contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) improperly considered his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.