Suzanna Sukiasyan v. Target Corporation

I. INTRODUCTION

18 On November 27, 2019, the Court granted summary judgment in this action in 20 favor of Defendant Target Corporation. (Order Granting Mot. for Summ. J. (“MSJ 21 Order”), ECF No 62.) Accordingly, on November 27, 2019, the Court entered 22 judgment in favor of Target. (Am. J. 1–2, ECF No. 64.) Plaintiff Suzanna Sukiasyan 23 now moves to alter, amend, or vacate the judgment under Federal Rules of Civil 24 Procedure 59(e) (“Motion”). (Mot. to Alter, Am., or Vacate J. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 65.) 25 For the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Sukiasyan’s Motion.1 26

28 1 After considering the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. II. BACKGROUND Sukiasyan brought a premises liability action against Target, alleging that 3 Target negligently owned, maintained, managed, and operated a store in which 4 substance on the floor caused her to slip and fall. (MSJ Order 1.) On October 21, 5 2019, Target moved for summary judgment (“MSJ”). Based on the evidence and 6…