Tauno A. Koivisto v. Debbie Accusion

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20202:20-cv-02689California432 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} TAUNO AUGUST KOIVISTO, Case No. 2:20-02689 CAS (ADS) Petitioner, v. ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS CORPUS

PETITION AND DENYING

|| DEBBIE ACCUSION, et al., CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Respondent. 15 Before the Court for screening is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by 17 || Petitioner Tauno August Koivisto, an inmate at California State Prison, Los Angeles ||County. [Dkt. No. 1]. Although the Petition is largely incoherent and illegible, to the 19 || extent that the Court can understand it, Petitioner again appears to allege a lack of 20 || medical care by prison staff. [Id.]. Therefore, Petitioner is not challenging his 21 || incarceration or his sentence, but is instead complaining about the conditions of his ||confinement. A habeas corpus petition is not the proper vehicle for challenging the 23 || conditions of confinement. The purpose of habeas corpus is to attack the legality of a 24 ||…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.