James William Tenerowicz v. Errol Spiro

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20202:20-cv-02784California1,308 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-2784 PA (SKx) Date March 30, 2020 Title James William Tenerowicz v. Errol Spiro et al.

Present: The Honorable PERCY ANDERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE T. Jackson Not Reported N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS - COURT ORDER The Court is in receipt of a Notice of Removal filed by defendants Miller and Desatnik Realty Corp. and Errol Spiro (“Defendants”). (Docket No. 1 (“Notice”).) The Notice alleges the Court possesses diversity jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (Id. at 3.) Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, having subject matter jurisdiction only over matters authorized by the Constitution and Congress. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co., 511 U.S. 375, 377 (1994). A suit filed in state court may be removed to federal court if the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.