Maria Garcia v. FCA US, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MARIA GARCIA, CV 20-2761 DSF (RAOx) Plaintiff, Order REMANDING Case to v. State Court
FCA US, LLC, et al., Defendants.
This case was removed on the basis of diversity. It is undisputed that one of the Defendants, Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram of Alhambra (“Alhambra”), is not diverse from Plaintiff. Removing Defendant FCA US, LLC argues that Alhambra is fraudulently joined. A defendant who is a resident of the forum state is fraudulently joined “‘if the plaintiff fails to state a cause of action against [the] resident defendant, and the failure is obvious according to the settled rules of the state.’” Morris v. Princess Cruises, Inc., 236 F.3d 1061, 1067 (9th Cir. 2001) (quoting McCabe v. Gen. Foods Corp., 811 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1987)). “[T]he test for fraudulent joinder and for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) are not equivalent.” Grancare, LLC v. Thrower, 889 F.3d 543, 549 (9th Cir. 2018). In evaluating a claim of fraudulent joinder, “a federal court must find that a defendant was properly joined and remand the case to state court if there is a ‘possibility that a…