Monique Walters v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20202:20-cv-00644California516 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: 2:20-cv-00644-AB-JC Date: April 2, 2020

Title: Monique Walters v. FCA US LLC, et al.

Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge Carla Badirian N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter

Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Appearing None Appearing

Proceedings: [In Chambers] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND [Dkt. No. 12]. Before the Court is Plaintiff Monique Walters’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand this case back to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. (Dkt. No. 12.) Defendant FCA US LLC (“Defendant”) opposes this motion. (Dkt. No. 14.) The Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and VACATES the April 3, 2020 hearing on Plaintiff's motion. For the reasons stated below the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion to remand. Diversity jurisdiction is present where “the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.