Tauno A. Koivisto v. Chief Medical Officer

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20202:20-cv-02979California437 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS- O 2

4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TAUNO A. KOIVISTO, Case No. 2:20-02979 CAS (ADS) Petitioner,

v. ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS CORPUS

PETITION AND DENYING

CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER, et al., CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Respondent. 15 Before the Court for screening is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Tauno A. Koivisto, an inmate at California State Prison, Los Angeles County. [Dkt. No. 1]. Although the Petition is largely incoherent and illegible, to the extent that the Court can understand it, Petitioner again appears to allege a lack of medical care while in prison. [Id.]. Therefore, Petitioner is not challenging his incarceration or his sentence, but is instead complaining about the conditions of his confinement. A habeas corpus petition is not the proper vehicle for challenging the conditions of confinement. The purpose of habeas corpus is to attack the legality of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.