Vickie Matthews v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20202:19-cv-01740California3,361 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICKIE M., Case No. 2:19-cv-01740-GJS

Plaintiff

v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND

ORDER

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Vicki M. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties consented to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge and filed briefs addressing the disputed issues in this case. [Dkt. 21 (“Pl. Br.”), Dkt. 28 (“Def. Br.”).] The Court has taken the parties’ briefing under submission without oral argument. For the reasons set

In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party in this case. 27 Andrew M. Saul, now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.