Vickie Matthews v. Nancy A. Berryhill
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20202:19-cv-01740California3,361 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VICKIE M., Case No. 2:19-cv-01740-GJS
Plaintiff
v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND
ORDER
ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Vicki M. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint seeking review of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties consented to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge and filed briefs addressing the disputed issues in this case. [Dkt. 21 (“Pl. Br.”), Dkt. 28 (“Def. Br.”).] The Court has taken the parties’ briefing under submission without oral argument. For the reasons set
In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non-governmental party in this case. 27 Andrew M. Saul, now…