Malka L. Fishman v. Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust, Ltd.

1 O

3

United States District Court Central District of California

10 11 MALKA FISHMAN, Case No. 2:19-cv-02444-ODW (ASx) Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v.

MOTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY

14 SUBWAY FRANCHISEE APPEAL AND TO STAY

ADVERTISING FUND TRUST, LTD., PROCEEDINGS [41]

15 Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Defendant Subway Franchisee Advertising Fund Trust (“Subway”) moves for an 19 order to certify an interlocutory appeal and stay proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b). 20 (Mot. for Interlocutory Appeal and to Stay Proceedings (“Mot.”) 1, ECF No. 41.) For 21 the reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES Subway’s Motion for Interlocutory 22 Appeal (“Motion”) and, therefore, DENIES as moot Subway’s Motion to Stay 23 Proceedings.1 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Malka Fishman initiated this putative class action against Subway for 26 violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, et 27 1 After carefully considering the papers filed in support of and in…