Salvador Arteaga Aragon v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20202:20-cv-02875California975 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Introduction

On January 12, 2018, a jury convicted Salvador Arteaga Aragon (“Petitioner”) of the following counts: 1. Conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(b)(1)(A); and 2. Distribution of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii). CR Dkt. 91 (minutes);1 CR Dkt. 94 (sealed verdict form); CR Dkt. 95 (redacted verdict form). On July 23, 2018, a judgment and probation/commitment order issued. CR Dkt. 174. The order committed Petitioner to the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for a term of 121 months. Id. On March 27, 2020, Salvador Arteaga Aragon (“Petitioner”) filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“Motion”). CV Dkt. 1. For the reasons stated in this Order, the Motion is DENIED. Because this Order does not address the merits of the matters presented in the Motion, any future motion by the Petitioner pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 will not be deemed a “second or successive motion.” Green v. White, 223 F.3d 1001, 1002 (9th Cir. 2000) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 485-86 (2000)).

II. Analysis

A. Legal Standards A district court may not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.