Charlean Latrice Mcdade v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20202:19-cv-05377California12,010 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

18 19 Charlean Latrice M. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint on June 20, 2019, seeking review of 20 the denial of her application for Disability Insurance benefits (“DI”) and Supplemental 21 Security Insurance (“SSI”). (Dkt. No. 1.) On March 9, 2020, the parties consented, pursuant 22 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to proceed before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. 23 Nos. 12, 20-21.) On March 6, 2020, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation (“Joint Stip.”). (Dkt. 24 No. 19.) Plaintiff seeks an order reversing and remanding solely for calculation of benefits or, 25 in the alternative, for further administrative proceedings. (Joint Stip. at 52-53.) The 26 27 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(B) and the recommendation of the 28 Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Commissioner requests that the ALJ’s decision be affirmed or, in the alternative, be remanded for further proceedings. (Id. at 53-55.) The Court has taken the matter under submission without oral argument. 4 SUMMARY OF PRIOR…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.