Neuschmid

Richard Lawrence v. Neuschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20202:19-cv-04410California2,250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 RICHARD LAWRENCE, Case No. 2:19-cv-04410-MWF (AFM) Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS

v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF NEUSCHMID, Warden, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

JUDGE

Respondent. 16 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the records on file, the initial Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“August 29, 2019 Report”), and the Amended Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Amended Report”). While Petitioner did not file objections to the Amended Report, the Court has considered the objections to the August 29, 2019 Report and has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. Petitioner’s objections are overruled. The Court adopts the findings and recommendations contained in the Amended Report with the following exceptions and additions: First, the Amended Report is corrected to reflect …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.