Veronica Buford v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20202:19-cv-02905California4,978 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 V.B., Case No. 2:19-cv-02905-SHK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v.

OPINION AND ORDER

14 ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff V.B.1 (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner,” “Agency,” or “Defendant”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) and supplemental security income (“SSI”), under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”). This Court has jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3), and, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge. For the reasons stated below, the Commissioner’s decision is REVERSED and this action is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Order. 27 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed applications for DIB and SSI on October 21, 2015, alleging 3 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.