Tauno August Koivisto v. Bo Harris

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20202:20-cv-03158California440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

JS-

2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} TAUNO AUGUST KOIVISTO, Case No. 2:20-03158 CAS (ADS) Petitioner, v. ORDER DISMISSING HABEAS CORPUS

PETITION AND DENYING

|| BO HARRIS, et al., CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY Respondent. 15 Before the Court for screening is a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by 17 || Petitioner Tauno August Koivisto, an inmate at California State Prison, Los Angeles 18 || County. [Dkt. No. 1]. To the extent that the Court can understand the Petition, 19 || Petitioner appears to allege a lack of access to specific food for his medical needs in 20 || prison. [Id.]. Therefore, Petitioner is not challenging his incarceration or his sentence, 21 || but is instead complaining about the conditions of his confinement. A habeas corpus 22 || petition is not the proper vehicle for challenging the conditions of confinement. The 23 || purpose of habeas corpus…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.