Paul Flores v. Robert Newschmid

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20202:20-cv-00500California463 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

PAUL FLORES, No. CV 20-00500-VBF (DFM)

Petitioner, Order Summarily Dismissing Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction v.

ROBERT NEWSCHMID, Warden,

Respondent.

On January 17, 2020, Paul Flores (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Dkt. 1 (“Petition”). On the same date, Petitioner requested that the instant proceedings be stayed under Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005). See Dkt. 3. The Court then ordered Respondent to file an opposition or statement of non- opposition to Petitioners’ request. See Dkt. 5 (“Response Order”). Respondent now moves to vacate the Response Order on the ground that the Petition is second and successive, and thus the Court lacks jurisdiction over the matter. See Dkt. 7. Respondent notes that Petitioner filed a federal habeas petition in 2007, which was dismissed with prejudice as untimely. See id. at 1; see also Flores v. Horel, No. 07-03100 (C.D. Cal. Filed May 10, 2007), Dkts. 1 (Petition), 14 (R&R), 30 (Order Accepting R&R), 31 (Judgment), 39 (Order Denying…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.