Kim Saunders v. Sally Beauty Supply LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20202:20-cv-02421California1,816 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

CUENNTITREADL S DTIASTTERSIC DTI SOTFR CICATL ICFOOURRNTIA

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No. CV 20-2421-GW-PLAx Date April 10, 2020 Title Kim Saunders v. Sally Beauty Supply LLC, et al.

Present: The Honorable GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Javier Gonzalez None Present Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None Present None Present

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER REMANDING ACTION FOR LACK OF

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

Sally Beauty Supply LLC and Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. (collectively, “the Sally Entities”) removed this action to this Court on March 13, 2020, asserting this Court’s subject matter jurisdiction over this case by way of the provisions for complete diversity present in 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). This Court must sua sponte consider its own subject matter jurisdiction. See, e.g., Pistor v. Garcia, 791 F.3d 1104, 1111 (9th Cir. 2015). Both of the Sally Entities are of diverse citizenship from plaintiff Kim Saunders (“Plaintiff”), who is alleged to be a California citizen. The Sally Entities did not,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.