John Herzfeld v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 14, 20202:18-cv-09784California3,583 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

44 55 66 77 United States District Court Central District of California

1100

1111 JOHN HERZFELD, Case No. 2:18-cv-09784-ODW (SSx)

1122 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR

1133 v. RECONSIDERATION [65]

1144 TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. OMNIBUS WELFARE PLAN, et al. 1155 Defendants. 1166 1177 I. INTRODUCTION 1188 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff John Herzfeld’s Motion for 1199 Reconsideration of the Court’s Order granting Defendant MCMC, LLC’s motion to 2200 dismiss (“Motion”). (Mot. for Recons. (“Mot.”), ECF No. 65.) For the reasons that 2211 follow, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.1 2222 II. BACKGROUND 2233 The Court addressed the relevant factual allegations and procedural history in 2244 its Order granting Defendant MCMC’s motion to dismiss and incorporates that 2255 discussion here by reference. (See Order Granting MCMC’s Mot. to Dismiss 2266 (“Order”), ECF No. 34.) The following brief summary is provided for context. 2277

2288 1 After considering the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.