Shannon C. Strnad v. Nancy A. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SHANNON C. S., ) Case No. ED CV 19-874-PJW ) Plaintiff, ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER v. ) ) ANDREW M. SAUL, )

COMMISSIONER OF THE )

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ) 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff appeals a decision by Defendant Social Security Administration (“the Agency”), denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”). She contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) erred when he determined that she could perform the jobs of marker and cleaner. For the reasons explained below, the Court concludes that the ALJ’s finding that Plaintiff could perform the job of marker is supported by substantial evidence and, therefore, the ALJ’s decision is affirmed.1 27 Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Andrew M. Saul,…