Chad C. Leonard v. Stuart Sherman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHAD C. LEONARD, Case No. 5:19-cv-00501-RGK (SHK) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS 14 STUART SHERMAN, Warden, AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE Respondent. JUDGE AND DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 17 Pursuant to Title 28 of the United States Code, section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge with the following exception: Page 8, lines 24-26 of the R&R are amended to read, “Pet. Mem. at 6, if the state court’s denial was based on an implicit finding that state law did not require that this instruction be given or that any error in that regard was harmless as a matter of…