Intervention911

Intervention911 v. City of Palm Springs

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20205:13-cv-01117-ODW-SPCalifornia3,756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

11 O

77 United States District Court Central District of California 1100

1111 INTERVENTION911, Case No. 5:13-cv-01117-ODW (SPx)

1122 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING FOR LACK

OF STANDING AND FOR FAILURE

1133 v. TO PROSECUTE [540]

1144 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS,

1155 Defendant.

1166 1177 On November 15, 2018, the Court heard argument in the instant matter as to the 1188 limited question of whether Plaintiff Intervention911 (“Plaintiff”) possesses standing 1199 to maintain the instant suit. On March 27, 2020, Defendant the City of Palm Springs 2200 (the “City”) filed an unopposed Motion to Dismiss for lack of prosecution (ECF No. 2211 540). As such, the Court will resolve the pendant standing issue and the motion to 2222 dismiss for lack of prosecution together, as opposed to separate orders. For the 2233 reasons to follow, the Court DISMISSES the case finding that Plaintiff does not 2244 possess standing to maintain this suit and for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal 2255 Rules of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 41(b).1 2266…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.