Plutos Sama Holdings, Inc. v. Torsten Maehle

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20208:19-cv-01010California1,880 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

O

2 3 4 5 6

United States District Court Central District of California

11 PLUTOS SAMA HOLDINGS, INC., Case № 8:19-CV-01010-ODW (AGRx)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING

v.

MOTION TO DISMISS [35]

14 TORTSEN MAEHLE et al.,

Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendant Torsten Maehle’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) 19 Plaintiff Plutos Sama Holdings, Inc.’s (“Plutos”) Complaint. (Mot. to Dismiss 20 (“Mot.”), ECF No. 35.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Maehle’s 21 Motion.1 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plutos is a holding company with interests across a wide array of industries, 24 including retail consumer markets. (Compl. ¶ 22, ECF No. 1.) Plutos initiated this 25 civil action against Torsten Maehle, Jurg Widmer, Alejandro Widmer, and Clemens 26 Gregor (collectively, the “Widmer Enterprise”), and three other individual

28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.