Plutos Sama Holdings, Inc. v. Torsten Maehle
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
O
2 3 4 5 6
United States District Court Central District of California
11 PLUTOS SAMA HOLDINGS, INC., Case № 8:19-CV-01010-ODW (AGRx)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING
v.
MOTION TO DISMISS [35]
14 TORTSEN MAEHLE et al.,
Defendants.
16 I. INTRODUCTION Before the Court is Defendant Torsten Maehle’s Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) 19 Plaintiff Plutos Sama Holdings, Inc.’s (“Plutos”) Complaint. (Mot. to Dismiss 20 (“Mot.”), ECF No. 35.) For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Maehle’s 21 Motion.1 II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plutos is a holding company with interests across a wide array of industries, 24 including retail consumer markets. (Compl. ¶ 22, ECF No. 1.) Plutos initiated this 25 civil action against Torsten Maehle, Jurg Widmer, Alejandro Widmer, and Clemens 26 Gregor (collectively, the “Widmer Enterprise”), and three other individual
28 1 Having carefully considered the papers filed in connection with the Motion, the Court deemed the matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. …