Henry Cardenas Ponce v. Laura Eldridge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HENRY CARDENAS PONCE, Case No. EDCV 19-00751-DMG-MAA 12 Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS v. AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE

LAURA ELDRIDGE, Warden, JUDGE 15 Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (“R&R,” Doc. # 9). The Court also has reviewed Petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation. (“Objections,” Doc. # 10.) As required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3), the Court has engaged in a de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner specifically has objected. Petitioner argues the merits of his claims and recounts the circumstances of his custody. (Objections at 2-4.) The Magistrate Judge recommended, however, dismissal of the Petition as untimely. (See R&R at 21.) In the Objections, Petitioner concedes “he…