Tracey Leeann Yuhas v. Andrew M. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 17, 20205:19-cv-01096California9,662 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

19 Plaintiff Tracey L. Y. (“Plaintiff”) challenges the Commissioner’s denial of 20 her application for a period of disability, disability insurance benefits (“DIB”), and 21 supplemental security income. For the reasons stated below, the decision of the 22 Commissioner is AFFIRMED.

II. PROCEEDINGS BELOW

24 On February 27, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Title II application for DIB alleging 25 disability beginning on May 20, 2013. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 283-84.) Her 26 27 1 Partially redacted in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. application was initially denied on August 25, 2015, and upon reconsideration on January 6, 2016. (AR 212-16, 218-22.) Plaintiff filed a Title XVI application for supplemental security income on August 30, 2016. (AR 211.) Her Title XVI application was denied upon reconsideration on March 19, 2017. (Id.) Plaintiff filed a written request for hearing, and a hearing was held on May 2, 2018. (AR 223-24, 153-83.) Represented by counsel,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.