Gilbert Rocha, Sr. v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaApril 15, 20202:18-cv-10601California2,850 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 GILBERT R., Case No. CV 18-10601-KK Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART

MOTION FOR EQUAL ACCESS TO

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of JUSTICE ACT FEES Social Security, 14 Defendant.

16 I. INTRODUCTION On March 12, 2019, Plaintiff’s counsel, Andrew T. Koenig (“Counsel”), filed a Motion for Attorney’s Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“Motion”). ECF Docket No. (“Dkt.”) 24. The Motion seeks fees in the amount of $6,989.44 for representing Gilbert R. (“Plaintiff”) in the underlying proceedings before this Court. Id. On April 2, 2020, Andrew Saul (“Defendant”) filed an Opposition. Dkt. 27. On April 7, 2020, Counsel filed a Reply seeking additional fees to draft the Reply for a total award of $7,297.32 and $400 in court costs. Dkt. 28. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge, 27 Partially redacted in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.